Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $37.73 vs $102.37
- Up to 56% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-11600 - $0.26 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4350 - 192 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
161
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2704 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
44%
Price, €
€113.63
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2705 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4350 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |