Buy on Amazon
€39.04
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $35.17 vs $80.43
- Up to 54% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-8100 - $0.32 vs $0.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4350 - 128 vs 122 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-4350
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
122
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.04
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4350 Processor (4M Cache, 3.60 GHz) BX80646I34350
Buy for €39.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-8100 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 3.6 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-4350
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i3-8100
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4350 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.