Buy on Amazon
€170.44
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2433 days newer than Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-4330 - 264 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 16 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 243 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-4330
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4330
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1066
66.12903225806451%
Multi-Core
2144
29.650117549439912%
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.