Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4170 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4170 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4170.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $30.42 vs $153.55
- Up to 79% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i9-11900F - $0.17 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 5% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i3-4170 - 212 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
201
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
21%
Price, €
€170.44
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4170 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |