Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4170 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4170 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4170.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $30.42 vs $160.86
- Up to 78% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-11700F - $0.27 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 13% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-4170 - 143 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 16 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
127
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
143
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
21%
Price, €
€178.55
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €178.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4170 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |