Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 2082 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10875H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4160T - 277 vs 265 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
