Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 827 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 84% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $185.81 vs $1166.95
- Up to 84% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $2.1 vs $13.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 54 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i3-4160 - 99 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 44 vs 4 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
98
98.98989898989899%
Value, €/FPS
€2.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€206.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €206.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38173 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.08/FPS
16.055045871559635%
Price, €
€1295.31
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
90.55319148936171%
Multi-Core
2072
21.5407006965381%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 22 |
4 | Threads | 44 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 145 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |