Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1660 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is 700 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 94% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $14.62 vs $257.64
- Up to 94% better value when playing F1 23 than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $0.08 vs $1.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 23 than Core i3-4160 - 203 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
194
95.56650246305419%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€16.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €16.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
5.673758865248227%
Price, €
€285.98
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for €285.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
90.7075873827792%
Multi-Core
2072
30.80582812964615%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |