Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 2724 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $185.81 vs $263.92
- Up to 16% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-12900F - $0.52 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-4160 - 470 vs 398 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
398
84.68085106382979%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€206.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €206.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3733 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
470
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
83.87096774193549%
Price, €
€292.95
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for €292.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3740 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
41.90626230799527%
Multi-Core
2072
14.917206623470122%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |