Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $8.4 vs $321.72
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-4160 - 161 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 20 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €9.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 302 minutes ago
Buy for €357.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 301 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
62.441314553990615%
Multi-Core
2072
24.60515378221114%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |