Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 3375 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - $8.4 vs $248.6
- Up to 96% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-14700K - $0.03 vs $0.82 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 18% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-4160 - 303 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 28 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
256
84.48844884488449%
Value, €/FPS
€0.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€9.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €9.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 347 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
303
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
3.6585365853658534%
Price, €
€275.95
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for €275.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 345 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
36.202790064647836%
Multi-Core
2072
10.726303256199204%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |