Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4160 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4160 is 1289 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-2400S - 101 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 70% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-2400S - $0.16 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i3-4160 - $43.86 vs $185.81
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
101
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€206.25
23%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €206.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
91
90.0990099009901%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
29.629629629629626%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
46.616541353383454%
Multi-Core
1352
65.25096525096525%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |