Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $8.4 vs $96.02
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-4160 - 124 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €9.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Buy for €106.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
64.17370325693607%
Multi-Core
2072
30.301257677683534%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |