Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 407 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 76% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i3-6100 - $0.1 vs $0.41 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-4160 - 170 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i3-4160 - $62.15 vs $185.81
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160 - 51 vs 54 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
168
98.82352941176471%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€206.25
33%
Value Winner
Buy for €206.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
24.39024390243903%
Price, €
€68.99
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
89.11222780569514%
Multi-Core
2072
88.6986301369863%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |