Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 3458 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 71% better value when playing New World than Core i3-14100F - $0.15 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 36% better in New World than Core i3-4160 - 145 vs 107 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i3-4160 - $66.15 vs $185.81
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 8 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
107
73.79310344827587%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€206.25
35%
Value Winner
Buy for €206.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
29.411764705882355%
Price, €
€73.43
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €73.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
42.69662921348314%
Multi-Core
2072
24.725536992840095%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |