Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1535 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $8.4 vs $164.59
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4160 - 171 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 24 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €9.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309 minutes ago
Buy for €182.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 308 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
83.51648351648352%
Multi-Core
2072
27.797155889455325%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |