Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $160.82 vs $197.42
- Up to 6% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-11900 - $0.46 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-4150T - 450 vs 389 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
389
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€178.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €178.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4613 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
450
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
93%
Price, €
€219.14
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4614 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |