Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $160.82 vs $180.79
- Up to 5% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-10700K - $1.07 vs $1.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Core i3-4150T - 178 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 16 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
167
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€178.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €178.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
94%
Price, €
€200.68
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for €200.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |