Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150T outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150T is 555 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than FX-8350 - 263 vs 253 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $135.27 vs $160.82
- Up to 13% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-4150T - $0.59 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €178.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |