Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 732 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770K - 180 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $32.9 vs $127.96
- Up to 76% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770K - $0.2 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 54 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€36.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €36.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10606 minutes ago
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10604 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |