Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3071 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $30.07 vs $207.66
- Up to 84% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-13600K - $0.16 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-4150 - 232 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 20 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
214
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
232
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
16%
Price, €
€230.5
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €230.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |