Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $21.73 vs $78.96
- Up to 70% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i5-11400F - $0.11 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-4150 - 234 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
220
94.01709401709401%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
29.72972972972973%
Price, €
€87.65
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €87.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
53.08516063233044%
Multi-Core
2047
26.90588853838065%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |