Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - $21.73 vs $83.34
- Up to 71% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i3-12100 - $0.14 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100 - 54 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 9% better in Deathloop than Core i3-4150 - 188 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
173
92.02127659574468%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2907 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
28.571428571428577%
Price, €
€92.51
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €92.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2914 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
48.44113541181945%
Multi-Core
2047
29.76588628762542%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 60 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |