Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 978 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 13% better in Rust than Celeron G3930T - 179 vs 158 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Rust than Celeron G3930T - $0.19 vs $0.2 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i3-4150 - $28.52 vs $30.07
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.38
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |