Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1023 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 47% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $30.07 vs $57.05
- Up to 48% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.11 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Resident Evil Village than Core i3-4130 - 298 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
296
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11624 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
298
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
52%
Price, €
€63.32
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11624 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |