Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1220 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - $30.07 vs $51.18
- Up to 40% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-7100 - $0.25 vs $0.42 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-4130 - 134 vs 132 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 51 vs 54 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
132
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11758 minutes ago
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11758 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |