Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 363 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3220 - 124 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $30.07 vs $57.77
- Up to 51% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3220 - $0.27 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12904 minutes ago
Buy for €64.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12903 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |