Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $30.07 vs $71.78
- Up to 55% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i3-10105F - $0.22 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 5% better in Saints Row than Core i3-4130 - 162 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
155
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
44%
Price, €
€79.68
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €79.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |