Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 730 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 44% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G3900 - 39 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 28% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G3900 - $0.86 vs $1.2 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i3-4130 - $29.18 vs $30.07
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
39
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.38
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6282 minutes ago
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6281 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |