Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 272 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 70% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron G1610 - 78 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 34% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron G1610 - $0.43 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i3-4130 - $27.05 vs $30.07
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
78
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.38
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15168 minutes ago
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |