Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4930K outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4930K is 966 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-390M - 171 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |