Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3775 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 16% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-390M - 364 vs 314 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 12 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-390M
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
