Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4013 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 41% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-390M - 190 vs 135 FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Arrandale | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |