Key Differences
In short — Core i3-390M outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-390M is 238 days older than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G530 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 4 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-390M
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Arrandale | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
