Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 3101 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-390M - 135 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €84.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |