Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3474 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-380M - 209 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 20 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
