Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1771 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 15% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-380M - 197 vs 172 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62489 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Single-Core
329
27.554438860971526%
Multi-Core
628
26.88356164383562%
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |