Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11800H outperforms Core i3-370M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11800H is 3978 days newer than Core i3-370M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-370M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-11800H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11800H
- Performs up to 22% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-370M - 280 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-370M - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-370M doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-370M
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Core i7-11800H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-370M | vs | Intel Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
