Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3468 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 9% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i3-350M - 201 vs 185 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-350M doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€62.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €62.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |