Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 3865 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $31.61 vs $447.82
- Up to 92% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-14900 - $0.25 vs $2.99 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 17% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3250 - 150 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 32 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
128
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Buy for €497.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |