Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3496 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $35.09 vs $369.24
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-3250 - 167 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 32 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €38.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76002 minutes ago
Buy for €409.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76003 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
19.602063375092115%
Multi-Core
1130
6.879337635455984%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |