Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2517 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $41.43 vs $314.41
- Up to 84% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-10900K - $0.42 vs $2.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 24% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-3250 - 135 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 20 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
109
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €45.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Buy for €349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |