Buy on Amazon
€44.9
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $138
Availability
MSRP in USD: $138
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $40.45 vs $204.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-9700F - $0.39 vs $1.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3250 - 134 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Core i3-3250 3.50GHz 2 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33250
Buy for €44.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
23%
Price, €
€226.44
19%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-9700F Desktop Processor 8 Core 3 GHz speed (Up to 4.7 GHz) Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W (BX80684I79700F)
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.