Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 1304 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - $41.2 vs $122.11
- Up to 55% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-7700 - $0.34 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 34% better in War Thunder than Core i3-3250 - 179 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
134
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €45.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Buy for €135.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |