Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 1579 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-8600K - $40.45 vs $86.23
- Up to 44% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-8600K - $0.3 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3250 - 178 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 6 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €44.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Buy for €95.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |