Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1304 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $42.28 vs $54.84
- Up to 14% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than Core i5-7400T - $0.38 vs $0.44 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 15% better in Dead Island 2 than Core i3-3250 - 138 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
120
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€46.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €46.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |