Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1304 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 9% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-3250 - 109 vs 100 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i3-3250 - $37.73 vs $41.2
- Up to 17% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-3250 - $0.38 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €45.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17564 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
109
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17565 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |