Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3240 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3240 is 279 days older than the more expensive Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-3250 - 456 vs 453 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i3-3250 - $29.98 vs $41.2
- Up to 30% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-3250 - $0.07 vs $0.1 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €45.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
456
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €33.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |