Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 3865 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - $41.2 vs $73.84
- Up to 29% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i3-14100F - $0.2 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 31% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-3250 - 296 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €45.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11622 minutes ago
Buy for €81.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |