Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2517 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - $35.09 vs $335.61
- Up to 88% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10300 - $0.33 vs $2.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 13% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3250 - 134 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
119
88.80597014925374%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €38.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.78/FPS
11.870503597122303%
Price, €
€372.53
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €372.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
33.99361022364217%
Multi-Core
1130
23.56621480709072%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |